Merge pull request #28 from bunnei/sleepthread
svc: Improve SleepThread for yield types.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -947,12 +947,24 @@ static void ExitThread() {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Sleep the current thread
|
||||
static void SleepThread(s64 nanoseconds) {
|
||||
LOG_TRACE(Kernel_SVC, "called nanoseconds={}", nanoseconds);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG(Kernel_SVC, "called nanoseconds={}", nanoseconds);
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't attempt to yield execution if there are no available threads to run,
|
||||
// this way we avoid a useless reschedule to the idle thread.
|
||||
if (nanoseconds == 0 && !Core::System::GetInstance().CurrentScheduler().HaveReadyThreads())
|
||||
if (nanoseconds == 0) {
|
||||
// Yield type 0 is just a yield without load balancing
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(0).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(1).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(2).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(3).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (nanoseconds < 0) {
|
||||
UNIMPLEMENTED_MSG("unimplemented yield type");
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(bunnei): Implement the various load balancing yield types here. This will force a
|
||||
// reschedule, but is incorrect.
|
||||
nanoseconds = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sleep current thread and check for next thread to schedule
|
||||
WaitCurrentThread_Sleep();
|
||||
@@ -960,7 +972,10 @@ static void SleepThread(s64 nanoseconds) {
|
||||
// Create an event to wake the thread up after the specified nanosecond delay has passed
|
||||
GetCurrentThread()->WakeAfterDelay(nanoseconds);
|
||||
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(0).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(1).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(2).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
Core::System::GetInstance().CpuCore(3).PrepareReschedule();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Wait process wide key atomic
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user